Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Who is Killing the Supermarket?



“If you grow faster than your market, you tie up capital.  
If your market grows faster than you do, you lose market share.”  
~Slim Fairview
The Quotations of Slim Fairview © 2018




Now, let’s move on to the death of the Supermarket as we know it.

Part of the problem is the Big-tailers.  And part of the problem is your
supplier.  And the rest of the problem is the supermarket industry
response to the problem


If your product sells out, shoppers will either

a. buy your product at another store
b. try your competitors product.


If we focus on you the retailer, you lose customers to a competitor.

If we focus on you the supplier, you lose customers to a competitor.

If you run out of product on the shelf, customers will try another product.
That, or try another store.


The problem for the supplier has been significantly blunted.  
While the customer may shop at another store, they will still buy
the same product. However, there is a third option. Buy your
product online.


The challenge for the retailer--owner of the supermarket--is different.

If consumers don't like the bread in your bakery department or don't
like the quality of your produce, they will move to another supermarket.
This is an in-house problem.


But the suppliers who stock your shelves have two options and they
appear to be using both. I noticed this a while back.  But it hit
home on a recent trip to the supermarket.  

I bought the last three bottles of caffeine-free, diet Pepsi, hereafter
known as Cfd-Pepsi.

This happened while "the youngster" from Pepsi was stocking
the shelves.

"You always run out.  Why don't you put more on the shelf?"
"I don't have enough space."
I pointed to the 10 rows of Pepsi.  
"Take down some of them and put it there."
"I can't. Corporate determines what goes in the space."

True?  Untrue?  I don't know.  However, I can tell you this about retail.  
No matter who you are, no matter what you sell, I can identify two
products that are not selling.

The stuff on the shelf.  I know this because your stuff is on the shelf.

The stuff that's not on the shelf.  I know this because you can't sell
something that's not on the shelf.

In short, corporate does not determine how the space is allocated.
The consumers do.



"There are no unintended consequences.  
Only unwanted consequences."
~ Slim Fairview.


The Incredible Shrinking Industry

Here is the new downside.

Consumers can continue moving to online supermarkets or buy from
club stores such as Sam's Club® or both.

Now, if you are a retailer, you have an incentive to keep product on
the shelf. If consumers buys Cfd-Pepsi online, consumers can also
buy other items:

Heavy Items:

Soft drinks
Bottled Water
Canned Goods

Bulky Items:

Paper products
Napkins
Bathroom Tissues
Potato Chips.

Fussy Items (many small items.):

Toothpaste
Vitamins
Deodorant
Paper Straws
Toothpicks
Shave Cream
Razor Blades
Q-Tips®

What does that leave you with?

Milk
Butter
Eggs
Cheese
Bacon

Perishables like Lettuce & Tomatoes
Frozen Items like:

Fish Sticks
Burger Patties
Shrimp

And your meat department.


If online savings are significant and, as incomes rise, your customers
will move to the butcher shop to buy meat.

And if keeping your shelves stocked in those areas is
a challenge, then the quality of management at your local
competitor will be a determining factor.

From my personal observation this is what you run out of:

unsalted butter
cream cheese (the real cream cheese)
Kraft, extra-sharp, Whole Milk, Cheddar Cheese--orange.

If a consumer does not find the aforementioned cheese on the shelf,
the consumer may buy another brand of cheddar
and not your healthier brand of cheddar.
If your customer tries a competitor then taste or price
may result in loss of sales.

The Kraft, ESWM Cheddar--orange routinely sells out.  The Cheese
made with 2% Milk, does not.

When you don't have enough ESWM Cheddar--orange on the shelf,
we buy the other brand.

Now, shelf space is a premium.  If you want to optimize your resources,
you ask yourself, "If I have 50 bottles of Pepsi across 10 facings
on the shelf, and three facings of the Cfd-Pepsi on the shelf
that are empty, I am losing sales. This may result in the loss
of customers and revenue.

While I am sympathetic to suppliers.  You should not be.
Let's look at widgets.

It is easier for The Widget Company to ship 10,000 widgets
a month to an e-tailer than to ship 100 widgets a week
to 24 retailers every week for a year.

The e-tailer can satisfy my customers' needs. I am optimizing
on the profit motive. However, there is the flip-side. The
retail store. To understand their predicament, let's look
at the PLCB.  The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board.

In Pennsylvania, liquor is sold in State owned stores.  
The PLCB is a profitable agency. One of the few government
agencies that brings money in to the State. The PLCB works
on the profit model.  The State liquor stores do not.
They operate on the revenue model.

Across the river, in New Jersey, liquor store owners operate
on the profit model.  It a customer wants Bolla® Soave,
and the store doesn't carry it, the owners will order a case.  
If it sells, they keep it in stock. If sales are low, they still keep
it in stock. Why? Because if they do not have it in stock,
the customer who wants it, will buy it at a competitor. And
in so doing, will buy other products at the other store.  

There are no competitors in Pennsylvania.


Great Product! Bad Management?

In the late eighties, we found what I believe was the best frozen pizza
on the market.  Red Baron® . They had four facings.
Plain, Pepperoni, Deluxe, Supreme Deluxe.

Four facings.  

My wife and I bought a plain pizza to try it.  It was great. I went
back the next day on my way home from work.  There were
three left. I bought one.

When I went back for more, there were none.  I asked the
youngster in frozen foods, if there was more in the back.

"No."  But that they were getting more in.

When the next shipment arrived, the facing was full.  I bought two.
Two days later the facing was empty. And it remained so until
the next shipment.

Eventually, it seems, they eliminated the Cheese Pizza.  
Now they have 4-cheese Pizza.
Nothing says "Italian" like cheddar cheese on a pizza.


The failure?

"The retailer repeatedly ordered more."

"The supplier repeatedly shipped more."

Both sides failed to grasp the concept:
"more high big numbers". [sic]


If your product is selling out, ship more high big numbers.

If your shelf is empty, order more high big numbers.  

Today, there is unbridled competition in the frozen pizza business.
We no longer buy Red Baron. I realize that consumer-taste
is constantly changing. However, there is little evidence in
the supermarket industry to suggest that getting rid of a line
of product optimizes space, attracts customers, increases
sales, or increases profits.


Failure to monitor the situation.

Now, as my my biggest complaint about online articles is,
they are descriptive,not prescriptive, I will offer up initial action.


Hand the manager of your store a clipboard, a pad of legal paper,
and a pen.  

Send interns or management trainees down the aisles to "unface"
the shelves.

Walk through the store, aisle by aisle, and have your manager
write down what has sold out.



Split your trainees into two small groups.

Group One walks ahead of your manager unfacing the shelves.  
Pushing products into their spots revealing gaping spaces that
are draining your revenue and jeopardizing your bottom line.


Group Two will follow to face the shelves.


The manger will do this twice a day for four weeks.  

Look at the invoices:  

What did we run out of?
How much did we order?  
Order more, high, big numbers.

Don't tell me about computers and truck to shelf stocking.
If computers worked you would not be running out of product.


But this addresses only part of the problem.

The Industry is not adjusting to the shift.
The industry is adapting to the shift.
The industry is not adjusting to the shift.

In a word: Change!

It is no secret that the variety on the shelf is dwindling.
Twenty-five feet of shelf space, 5 feet by 5 shelves, that
displayed a variety of rice--by brand, type, price--has dwindled
to a few feet of space with some bagged rice & pasta meals,
and a few boxes of instant rice.

Suppliers and Retailers are complicit in the devolution of
the industry.

Some options:

Have customers call in or go online to shop their list then
come in later to pick it up.

Have phone shopping or online shopping coupled with a
delivery service.

Have customers buy butter, eggs, milk, bread, cheese, bread,
and orange juice, but have bulky items, heavy items, and
fussy items delivered or shipped to their homes.

Start a joint venture with other local markets to buy a
"local warehouse" to make it possible to deliver food
regardless of which store made the sale.

The last may seem counter-intuitive, however, you are
talking about survival.

Best of luck.

Sincerest regards,

Slim Fairview

If you find anything here to be helpful, please don't hesitate
to send me a really tricked out Mac and to tuck a few dollars
into the envelope along with the thank you note.  Slim.

Bob Asken
Box 33
Pen Argyl, PA 18072


Copyright (c) 2018 Bob Asken
All rights reserved.




Thursday, May 3, 2018

60 Over 60



We've all seen the articles:  30 under 30.  People under thirty who are transforming the world.

Now...Fill the Gap.

60 over 60.  

60 people over 60 who are transforming the world.

Do I really have to explain it to the television people?


  • Boomers watch television.
  • Boomers watch commercials.
  • Boomers have discretionary income.


If you want to tap into a market for your advertisers, try doing a weekly TV show focusing on 60 over 60.

It's not that hard.

Regards,

Slim

If you find this to be helpful, please don't hesitate to send me a really tricked out Mac Book and to tuck a few dollars into the envelope along with the thank you note.  Slim.



slimfairview@yahoo.com

Box 33
Pen Argyl, PA
18072

Copyright (c) 2018 Bob Asken
All rights reserved.


Friday, April 27, 2018

CHINA: Global Economic Realignment



China:   1 Billion  300 Million People.

U.S.     ********* 300 Million People.

If China Creates 300 Million Creates Innovative High Tech Entrepreneurs, they have 1 Billion people to do the work.
If We Create 300 Million Creates Innovative High Tech Entrepreneurs, we have no one to do the work.
It took 400 years to build The Great Wall of China. China does not care who the next US President is. or the next five. At 2 terms each, we're talking about 40 years. The next 50 US Presidents? 400 years.
Don't worry about China being a Communist Country with a controlled economy.
Worry when China becomes a Free Market Democracy.
The arithmetic would suggest:
4 Thomas Edisons
4 Henry Fords,
4 Steves (Jobs and Wozniak) for a total of 8
When we become "Energy Independent" Saudi Arabia sells their oil to China who goes on a 
":Global Economic Realignment developing the Emerging Economies and building alliances and making friends."
If you find anything here to be helpful, please don't hesitate to send me a really tricked out MacBook and to tuck a few dollars into the envelope along with the thank you note. Slim.
Regards,
Slim.
From China: Global Economic Realignment.
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Asken. All rights reserved.
Box 33, Pen Argyl, PA 18072

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

TOP SECRET 2.0 REVEALED


A Government Intel Operation sets up a Deep Cover World Wide Web.

It you post an article on your blog, no one sees it except Intel Agents.

If you Tweet the link or a comment no one sees it except Intel Agents.

When you see a like, a retweet, or a reply from your followers on Twitter, they are fabricated by Intel Agents with no knowledge of the real followers.

Your LinkedIn Connexions are generated or fabricated by the agents.  It looks like you are being read and receiving replies.  However, the only people who see them are the agents at Intel.  Even your blog stats are fabricated.  Did you really receive 300 visits from China?  Is that comment real?  Did someone from The Times like your tweet or did that come from Intel?  This, without anyone from The Times knowing about the exchange.

Then, one day, you are contacted by a defector.  And the two of you work to expose the operation never knowing whether your activity on the Internet are real, or captured by Intel Agents.


It is immense.

It is all powerful.

It is all consuming.

It is all knowing.

Every cent you spend is on file.  Every item you ever bought, every item you buy, and every item you ever will buy is known.  At first algorithms predict what you will buy.  Then, algorithems will determine what you buy.

All your health records are on file. 

Every illness you have.
Every illness you ever had. 
Every illness you ever will have.


Where were you? 
Where are you? 
Where will you be?

At first, algorithms will predict where you will be.  
Then, algorithms will determine where you will be.


Who do you know?
Who did you know?
Who will you know?

At first, algorithms will predict who you will know.  Then algorithms will determine who you will know.  Algorithms will connect you.

The boy you fell in love with.
The girl you are going to date.
The person you will marry.

At first, algorithms will predict who you will marry.   Then algorithms will determine who you will marry.


Even the Government is powerless to stop them.

The Government launched the project.  Or did they?  Or only think they did?


TOP SECRET

Your lines of communication can never be trusted.

A Movie?  A Television Series?  A Streaming Series?

Warmest regards,

Slim.
(Maybe.)

Copyright (c) 2018 Bob Asken. All rights reserved.

Bob Asken
Box 33
Pen Argyl, PA 18072

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Deadly Sins of Management




Selling off assets is one of the Many Deadly Sins of Management.

2.  Now, (In view of the Miss America Scandal) being stupid enough to both hold those views and to put them in E-mails.

3.  Defending incompetent Managers in your organisation instead of Firing them because you believe that fixing a problem is a sign of incompetence.

4.  Failing to take action when employee complaints reach your level because you believe that if you ignore them they will go away.

5.  Delegating authority to those without adequate abilities and without adequate oversight because you believe in credentialism.

6.  Ignoring deliverables and measurables because you believe failure to reach targets can be blamed on others.

7.  Believing your legal department can cover your ass.

8.  Believing your position of authority will protect you.

9.  Taking responsibility as a tactic to shift blame to others.


Regards,

Slim

If you find anything here to be helpful, please don't hesitate to send me a really tricked out Macbook and to tuck a few dollars into the envelope along with the thank you note.  Slim.

Robert Asken
Box 33
Pen Argyle, PA 18072

LinkedIn Profile
https://www.linkedin.com/in/slimfairview/



Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Asken
All rights reserved.


Saturday, October 28, 2017

Delagating. Do & Do Not



What to do when you have to delegate authority.


1. Delegate authority to the person(s) with a proven track record.


2. Allow that person to pick his or her own team


3. Set Deliverables and Measurables.


4. Set a fair and transparent means for reassigning individuals in the group who are disruptive.

NB   Disruptive is not creative. Creative is not disruptive.


5. Receive regular updates on progress. (If necessary, offer validations)


6. Insure that the team has the resources necessary. For example:

Do not assume that the supervisor is smart enough to know that when the number of packers rises from 4 to 10 then the number of scissors should rise from 4 to 10. Or from 3 to 10 if he had 4 people working with 3 pair of scissors because 1 pair broke.


7. Establish the protocols in your company to insure that another manager does not feel comfortable usurping your prerogative to assign projects and staff by interfering with the project because he needs help, or supplies, because he is incompetent yet still works for you.


8. Communication: Make sure that a disruptive person has the opportunity to speak to you directly. He may not be the problem. Follow up on the information you receive.


Regards,

Slim.

Slimfairview@yahoo.com

Slimviews@gmail.com

Copyright (c) 2017 Bob Asken All rights reserved.

Saturday, September 30, 2017

Tech v. Education


With all due respect. 

When I was a freshman. (3rd form) I went to Public School (US version) They had two tracks. The University track (college track) and the track for those who intended not to go beyond High School. That track focused on Mechanical Drawing, wood shop metal shop, typing, home economics. I took advantage of those options to take typing and mechanical drawing before transferring to The Prep.

True, in part, about practical applications. US High Schools are supposed to "educate" students not train them.

English courses, teach students to communicate.

Math courses will prepare students for tech [read, math] Geometry, true, is valuable only to those students who intend to become architects or geometry teacher.

History, well.... "Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it." Santayana

Those who never learned history are doomed--Period!" Slim Fairview
The Quotations of Slim Fairview. © 2017

We also have the alternative: Vo-Tech. Vocational / Technical. Public Schools, Private Schools, and Vo-Tech schools can teach AI.

I became a website designer 1. January 2000.  That career did not exist when I was at School or at University.  And though it is very possible that what students learn today may still be viable when they turn 47, there may be careers that don't exist today.  Op cit, Website designer.  


Web design is not so much technology--I used Front Page 2000®--as it is design.  This came from a semester of art at University and Art in Grammar School and High School.  

People, today, have little concept of the education of the 50s and the 60s and cite what they don't know as a fictive device to advance their agenda.

Read BOTH

Democracy - & the Fall of the Athenian Republic
Alexander Tyler & James Olson


And

Fall of the Athenian Republic



Regards,

Slim,

Copyright © 2017 Bob Asken
All rights reserved.

Saturday, April 15, 2017

Sales Force Turnover?


I just replied to a tweet from someone who posed the question about turnover among his sales people. I will share my replies. 

  • Be up front about compensation and lead generation 

  • Be up front about sales figures, sales cycles & about leads. 

  • Be up front about Training, your products, and about the Competition. 

  • Don't irritate your sales people with pep talks & platitudes during down cycles just because the Sales Mgr is looking to make his override on marginal increments. 

The same comments about for sales targets and sales goals. Your sales people know what's going on out there.

Sales is a numbers game

Don't hire too many sales people who will compete with each other in the same customer pool. Refer to comments on the Sales Manager's Override.

If there is a down-turn in sales, don't look at the sales force first. Look at the Sales Manager first. 

Address the complaints from the sales force. Don't just listen. 

Don't placate. Investigate. 

Regards, 

Slim

If you find anything here to be helpful, please don't hesitate to send me a really tricked out Macbook and to tuck a few dollars into the envelope along with the thank you note.  Slim

Robert Asken
Box 33
Pen Argyle. PA 18072


Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Asken
All rights reserved.

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Where We are Going


What is happening globally with migration on one of the basic laws of physics.


I illustrated this in my ppt presentation 

Solving The Global Crisis




I pointed out that Russia is engaged in Economic Warfare. 

The Visible Hand 


and 

Mr. Putin's ETO 



China knows it will not stay in business very long if it puts its best customers out of business. China will not harm Western markets. 


As India transforms, India will have a more efficient handling of crops. No longer will food rot on the vine or in the field because there are difficulties in bringing the food to market in a timely manner. India will embrace the technology that will be crucial to the future of nations. 


Africa will embrace the models of Industrialised Nations: 
Capital Investment, 
Economic Stimulus, 
Economic Development, & 
Growth. 

Capital Investment + Economic Stimulus = Economic Development + Growth ~ Slim's Paradigm.


Forming an E 20 Group of Nations


Solving the Emerging Economic Crisis



 I have predicted that Plastics will replace wood and steel as a more efficient and cost-effective way of building things. 

Plastics:  



But the largest concern is the control of resources: 

Who controls which resources will be crucial to survival. This is explained in 
  
"Economic Soft-War" 



This is why Globalisation is so important.

Protectionism Isolationism Nationalism
Are the Axis of Evil that impedes or prevents Solving the problems of Famine, Pandemics, and Global Economic Recessions and Depressions & lead to Civil Unrest, Genocide and War.  Support Globalisation.


Thank you for your interest. 

Sincerely, 

Slim.

On LinkedIn 



Slimfairview@yahoo.com

Slimviews@gmail.com 

Bob Asken
Box 33 
Pen Argyl, PA 18072

Copyright (c) 2017  Bob Asken
All Rights Reserved.