Tuesday, May 10, 2011
We must liberate ourselves from the notion that a gutsy leader will arise to save us. Remember the admonition: "...a confederacy of dunces will rise up around him..."
I am now 4 decades into discussing group-think.
Let's assume for the moment that:
a. W still have group think.
b. We must get rid of group think.
Now, we are still discussing group think.
Is is possible that all the methods to get rid of group think have failed? As evidenced by the fact that we still have group think--yes.
Do we ever come up with a new way to get rid of group think? No.
Is that group think? Yes.
By constantly clutching to the notion that we must get rid of group think, and constantly pursuing the sames methods to get rid of group think, are we not merely perpetuating group think but also reinforcing group think?
The focus is always to narrow.
Bring as many different people into the group to get as many different ideas as possible.
Cultivate a culture of shared vision. (Shared vision?)
The visioning process.
Team building. (Cohesion)
Consensus building.(Group think)
Get rid of as many different ideas as we can until we have consensus.
Call this Leadership in Action.
I will be the leader. I will get as many different people on my team as I can. I will lead the group to share a vision. I will engage in team building exercises. I will achieve consensus.
If it works, I am a visionary leader. If it fails, I fell victim to group think.
And, now, you can see the process for what it is.
If you treat everyone to lunch, you will have achieved "Bread & Circus".
Copyright (c) 2011 Slim Fairview